• Handing of emergency cash to RBS and HBoS in 2008/09 to be reassessed
  • Two further reviews will examine economic forecasting and ongoing plans to support banks
  • Probes to be conducted by experts who are not employees of the central bank

By Becky Barrow, Business Correspondent

|


The Bank of England yesterday revealed plans for three independent reviews of its handling of Britain’s financial crisis.

Officials said that the reviews would ‘focus on ensuring the Bank has the capability to respond to future crises’.

They will be led by three City experts, Ian Plenderleith, Bill Winters and David Stockton – each paid around 80,000 for the job – and undertaken over five months, with the conclusions published at the end  of October. 

Sir David Lees, chairman of the Bank’s ‘court’, a body similar to a company’s board, which commissioned the reviews, admitted it was ‘important’ to learn ‘practical lessons’ from the past.

Scrutiny: The Bank of England has bowed to pressure to re-examine its actions during the financial crisis

Scrutiny: The Bank of England has bowed to pressure to re-examine its actions during the financial crisis

Both the Treasury Select Committee and the Financial Services Authority have each conducted several major inquiries in recent years.

Tory MP Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the influential Treasury Select Committee, said yesterday that a review should have been done sooner.

He added: ‘What we needed was a comprehensive review by the Bank of its performance through the course of the crisis from which we can all draw lessons. That review should have been done much earlier, before the euro crisis deepened.’

The investigation comes less than three weeks after the Bank’s governor was asked why he was ‘so scared’ at the possibility of an inquiry.

The governor admitted earlier this month that more should have been done to avert the banking crisis and conceded the Bank of England should have 'shouted from the rooftops' that banks had been allowed to borrow and lend too much.

'We were certainly late to the game in understanding the scale of the fragility in the banking system and the potential consequence when those risks materialised,' he said.

David Ruffley, a senior Tory MP and a member of the Treasury Select Committee, said: ‘It is a case of better late than never.’

He attacked the Bank’s court, which is similar to a company’s board of executives and non-executives,  for being ‘amazingly slow’ to commission the reviews.

'Least distinguished': Bank governor Sir Mervyn King has been the target of fierce criticism from former Labour City minister Lord Myners

'Least distinguished': Bank governor Sir Mervyn King has been the target of fierce criticism from former Labour City minister Lord Myners

One will look at the Bank’s decision to pump up to 62billion into HBOS, owner of Halifax, and Royal Bank of Scotland, to keep the disgraced banks afloat.

This action, known as the ‘emergency liquidity assistance’ scheme, took place nearly four years ago during the disastrous autumn of 2008.

The two other reviews will look at the way it provides liquidity to the whole banking system, and its recently erratic ability to accurately forecast inflation and economic growth.

Mr Ruffley slammed the fact that a review has had to wait for the ‘out of date and laggardly’ court of the Bank to make up its mind ‘when they are finally ready for it to be done.’

Previous investigations have triggered frustrations that nobody was sanctioned, struck off or sacked for their role in the financial crisis.

The FSA’s inquiry into the cataclysmic collapse of Royal Bank of Scotland caused outrage because its former boss escaped any form of punishment from the regulator. Despite his pivotal role in the collapse of RBS, Fred Goodwin continues to enjoy a gold-plated lifestyle, funded by a 342,500- a-year pension from the bank.

None of the Bank’s three inquiries will be a witch hunt, and are instead  expected to focus on drier economic subjects.

In a sign of how it will not be ‘naming and shaming’ those who made mistakes in the past, in a statement announcing the reviews the Bank said: ‘They will focus firmly on lessons to improve the way the Bank operates.’

Chris Leslie, Labour Treasury spokesman, said: ‘The three partial reviews are not a substitute for a more fundamental review of the Bank’s role during the financial crisis.

‘How can the Government ask us to  support massive new powers for the  Bank when it has refused to review its own role in the financial crisis and has had this small review dragged out of it by parliamentarians?’

Mr Plenderleith, who worked for the Bank for 37 years until 2002, will carry out the emergency liquidity review, while the overall liquidity review will be performed by Bill Winters, who worked for the investment bank JP Morgan for 26 year.

The third investigation, into the Bank’s economic forecasting, will be carried out by David Stockton, a senior adviser at Macroeconomics Advisers, an American independent research firm.

All three will continue with their normal day jobs and conduct the inquiries in their spare time.

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

The current moguls of the Banking Industry where ever they are located have certainly been successful at one thing. Namely the near complete destruction of their industry, the confidence of Nations and the near bankrupting of working decent people. Frame that on any citation for honors that maybe proposed or given in the future.

The current moguls of the Banking Industry where ever they are located have certainly been successful at one thing. Namely the near complete destruction of their industry, the confidence of Nations and the near bankrupting of working decent people. Frame that on any citation for honors that maybe proposed or given in the future.

If you read sone of the university textbooks on financial economics, there is a paragraph which says that "if a business customer opens an account, deposits a sum of money, takes out a loan and uses the business as security on that loan, then the bank is said to have increased its worth threefold; the business, the deposit and the interest payments on that loan. The bank can then use this investment to borrow more money from other banks." - Thor, Norway, 21/5/2012 23:59>>>>>>> But the Bank of England is not a retail bank, nor a wholesale bank, nor an investment bank.

If you read sone of the university textbooks on financial economics, there is a paragraph which says that "if a business customer opens an account, deposits a sum of money, takes out a loan and uses the business as security on that loan, then the bank is said to have increased its worth threefold; the business, the deposit and the interest payments on that loan. The bank can then use this investment to borrow more money from other banks."

The Bank of England is NOT the bank of England, it's a private Bank who our elected leaders work for and ensure we BORROW money from this NOT Bank of England rather than issuing our own money as a Sovereign Nation should.

they lost out to the monster which was the fsa though and they should keep pointing that out, new labour turned boe into a money provider and little else

A banks function is to lend money into the economy from deposits. Giving interest to depositors so that they deposit money (to be re-lent out) rather than putting it under the mattress. The bailout is the exact reverse of this. i.e. stealing money from the economy to refinance the banks. They should have been allowed to fail.

And do you know what, he will not be forced to pay back millions in pay for things that he's paid to look for or plan for. Same as the bankers and fund managers, they get millions for losing everyones money only to pockets hundreds of thousands at our expense, they simply seduce us all into these fancy funds with promises of double digit growth and growth rates way above inflation. They talk about a sideways moving market, thats basically means an admittance that there will be little actual growth in stockmarkets over the next 10 years, and they wander why people do not pay into pensions.

The BoE was a joke when I worked in the City back in the late 70s early 80s after Labour reduced them to producing Tabloids to support Labour rather than Treasury Blue Papers that had all the data that Students and Analysts needed. The Insurance failures although who would think of IBM360s and the residual value which IBM destroyed now but the J-Plan (with Lloyds Re-insuring the residual values and then trying to get out of it) was another example of the BoE. I don't know that the BoE ever left Labour's control ala BBC ... Labour fixed the structure as is does so even when voted out it has key people at all levels to continue it's policies. This has always been Labour and his decisions are defined by Labour and Labour's Policies were bleed the old (good old stalinist) they are useful any more, pay the young we need their votes. He in fairness to him has done nothing more than follow the instructions on the box, see his kids get a good education.

Typical! Bankers investigating bankers. The bloke down the pub knows more about liquidity ratios than all the bankers combined. Perhaps some of the people with savings accounts at the Bank of England should be allowed to look at the books.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.