|
Pledge: Prospective Rangers buyer Charles Green
Charles Green has told Rangers fans he will not 'abuse' their money and insists he will not use cash from season ticket sales to fund his takeover.
The former Sheffield United chief executive - who is leading the consortium in place to buy the administration-hit club - was responding to comments made by Ibrox director Dave King.
King urged fans to reject the Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), which will be voted on by creditors next Thursday, while calling on supporters not to renew their season tickets until Green reveals the details of his plans.
Craig Whyte completed his own takeover of Sir David Murray's majority shareholding last May with money from the sale of future season ticket income to investment firm Ticketus.
Green told Rangers' official website on Friday night: 'On the basis the receiver is already holding cash and we haven't put the season tickets up for sale yet, I struggle to see how I can use season ticket money to buy the club.
'The season ticket renewal letters are actually going out today and I have already deposited money with the administrator to buy the club.
'We have provided the money to buy the club and we have documented the fact we are going to raise another 20-30million on top of that.
'The important thing - which is in the letter I've sent out to fans - is that season ticket money, when it comes in, will actually be sat in an account specifically to hold it there.
Takeover turmoil: Rangers future hangs in the balance
'For legal reasons, there is a 28-day cooling period after next Thursday should the CVA go ahead.
'Until that period ends, any monies that come into the club are held in a secure account and I have no access to that money.
'The season ticket money is crucial. The very suggestion we would be using it to buy the club is ridiculously untrue.
'The more season tickets any club sells, the more that can be invested back into the club and into players.
'If we are looking and speaking to the real, true Rangers fans, I'd say to them if there was ever a time to support the club it is now.
'They will know for the first time in many, many years that their money will not be abused the way it was before.'
Green is adamant his consortium will complete its purchase of Rangers, whether the CVA is accepted or whether the club has to opt for a newco route instead.
He added: 'We said from day one that our intentions were to acquire Rangers and the CVA was always the preferred option.
'I have no control over that. Only creditors have and next Thursday there will be a meeting and either the CVA will go ahead or it will be rejected.
'If it is rejected, we will immediately default into a newco route.
'There is nothing anyone can say on the outside to change the fact my consortium will acquire the business next Thursday.'
Green says King's comments were 'disruptive' at a time when he is attempting to gain the trust of a disillusioned Rangers support.
He said: 'Dave is someone I've never met but I contacted him last Friday in South Africa and we had a conversation.
'I sent him a copy of the presentation we've made public to tell him what our vision was. He owns 5% of the club and I felt it was important he had a chance to buy into it.
'I was expecting some reply but clearly the comments he made were outrageous and I'm disappointed.
'I have great difficulty where someone purports to be acting in the best interests of the club then recommends creditors should vote down a CVA. That is exactly what the club doesn't want.
'Real fans want to keep the tradition but what Dave King is saying is that the history and tradition of Rangers is of no consequence.
'It's not helpful to hear his thoughts and I think it is disruptive because the fans are getting mixed messages.
'We've said consistently because of what has happened historically at the club that there's a lack of trust and we have taken that on board.
'I understand the nervousness of fans, particularly after the issues of the last few years, but my upbringing was to treat someone as you find them and we've not let anyone down.'
However, he did agree with King's claim that Green - like Whyte - will not last a year at Ibrox.
He added: 'He's absolutely right on that because the minute I finish doing my job here I will leave the club.
'My job is to remove the debts, get Rangers on a sound footing and put 20-30million in the bank. Once that is done, I'm of no use to the club at all.'
Why Money Market Funds Break The Buck - Yahoo Finance
Money market funds are often thought of as cash and a safe place to park money that isn't invested elsewhere. Investing in a money market fund is a low-risk, low-return investment in a pool of very secure, very liquid, short-term debt instruments. In fact, many brokerage accounts sweep cash into money market funds as a default holding investment until the funds can be invested elsewhere.
SEE: Money Market
Money market funds seek stability and security with the goal of never losing money and keeping net asset value (NAV) at $1. This one-buck NAV baseline gives rise to the phrase "break the buck," meaning that if the value falls below the $1 NAV level, some of the original investment is gone and investors will lose money.
This only happens very rarely, but because money market funds are not FDIC-insured, they can lose money. Find out how this happens and what you can do to keep your "risk-free" assets truly risk free
Insecurity in the Market
Even though investors are typically aware that money market funds are not as safe as a savings account in a bank, they treat them as such because, as their track record shows, they are very close. But given the rocky market events of 2008, many did wonder if their money market funds would break the buck.
In the history of the money market, dating back to 1971, there was only one fund that broke the buck until the 2008 financial crisis. In 1994, a small money market fund that invested in adjustable-rate securities got caught when interest rates increased and paid out only 96 cents for every dollar invested. But as this was an institutional fund, no individual investor lost money, and 37 years passed without a single individual investor losing a cent.
In 2008 however, the day after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for bankruptcy, one money market fund fell to 97 cents after writing off the debt it owned that was issued by Lehman. This created the potential for a bank run in money markets as there was fear that more funds would break the buck.
Shortly thereafter, another fund announced that it was liquidating due to redemptions, but the next day the United States Treasury announced a program to insure the holdings of publicly offered money market funds so that should a covered fund break the buck, investors would be protected to $1 NAV.
Track Record of Safety
There are three main reasons that money market funds have a safe track record.
- The maturity of the debt in the portfolio is short-term (397 days or less), with a weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days or less. This allows portfolio managers to quickly adjust to a changing interest rate environment, thereby reducing risk.
- The credit quality of the debt is limited to the highest credit quality, typically 'AAA' rated debt. Money market funds can't invest more than 5% with any one issuer, except the government, so they diversify the risk that a credit downgrade will impact the overall fund.
- The participants in the market are large professional institutions that have their reputations riding on the ability to keep NAV above $1. With only the very rare case of a fund breaking the buck, no firm wants to be singled out for this type of loss. If this were to happen, it would be devastating to the overall firm and shake the confidence of all its investors, even the ones that weren't impacted. Firms will do just about anything to avoid breaking the buck, and that adds to the safety for investors.
Although the risks are generally very low, events can put pressure on a money market fund. For example, there can be sudden shifts in interest rates, major credit quality downgrades for multiple firms and/or increased redemptions that weren't anticipated. Another potential issue could occur if the fed funds rate drops below the expense ratio of the fund, which may produce a loss to the fund's investors.
To reduce the risks and better protect themselves, investors should consider the following:
- Review what the fund is holding. If you don't understand what you are getting into, then look for another fund.
- Keep in mind that return is tied to risk - the highest return will typically be the most risky. One way to increase return without increasing risk is to look for funds with lower fees. The lower fee will allow for a potentially higher return without additional risk.
- Major firms are typically better funded and will be able to withstand short-term volatility better than smaller firms. In some cases, fund companies will cover losses in a fund to make sure that it doesn't break the buck. All things being equal, larger is safer.
Money market funds are sometimes called "money funds" or "money market mutual funds," but should not be confused with the similar sounding money market deposit accounts offered by banks in the U.S.
The major difference is that money market funds are assets held by a brokerage, or possibly a bank, whereas money market deposit accounts are liabilities for a bank, which can invest the money at its discretion - and potentially in (riskier) investments other than money market securities. In a money market fund, investors are buying securities and the brokerage is holding them. In a money market deposit account, investors are depositing money in the bank and the bank is investing it for itself and paying the investor the agreed-upon return.
If a bank can invest the funds at higher rates than it pays on the money market deposit account, it makes a profit. Money market deposit accounts offered by banks are FDIC insured, so they are safer than money market funds. They often provide a higher yield than a passbook savings account and can be competitive with money market funds, but may have limited transactions or minimum balance requirements.
The Bottom Line
Prior to the 2008 financial crisis, only one small institution fund broke the buck in the preceding 37 years. During the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S. government stepped in and offered to insure any money market fund, giving rise to the expectation that it would do so again if another such calamity were to occur. It's easy to conclude then that money market funds are very safe and a good option for an investor that wants a higher return than a bank account can provide, and an easy place to allocate cash awaiting future investment with a high level of liquidity. Although it's extremely unlikely that your money market fund will break the buck, it's a possibility that shouldn't be dismissed when the right conditions arise.
More From Investopedia
Stocks with Downward Wedge Patterns: (NIHD), (BBG), (HL), (GEL), (WEN) - takeoverchatter.com
Shares of NII Holdings Inc (NIHD) traded higher by 4.78% or $0.52/share to $11.4. In the past year, the shares have traded as low as $10.33 and as high as $44.00. On average, 3851550 shares of NIHD exchange hands on a given day and today's volume is recorded at 3772641.
Shares of Bill Barrett Corp (BBG) fell by 1.41% or $-0.25/share to $17.45. In the past year, the shares have traded as low as $17.55 and as high as $52.14. On average, 1462800 shares of BBG exchange hands on a given day and today's volume is recorded at 663642.
Shares of Hecla Mining Co (HL) traded higher by 1.11% or $0.05/share to $4.55. In the past year, the shares have traded as low as $3.68 and as high as $8.56. On average, 5383740 shares of HL exchange hands on a given day and today's volume is recorded at 3207314.
Shares of Genesis Energy LP (GEL) traded higher by 0.42% or $0.12/share to $28.48. In the past year, the shares have traded as low as $19.91 and as high as $33.33. On average, 270170 shares of GEL exchange hands on a given day and today's volume is recorded at 56701.
Shares of The Wendy's Company (WEN) fell by 0.66% or $-0.03/share to $4.5. In the past year, the shares have traded as low as $4.23 and as high as $5.53. On average, 3739340 shares of WEN exchange hands on a given day and today's volume is recorded at 1316372.
Stocks Near Highs, Francesca's Jumps To 50-Day Line - Investors Business Daily
Markets Update
Fri, Jun 08 2012 00:00:00 E 00_WEBStocks held near their intraday highs in late trading Friday but volume was low, reflecting cautious optimism that Europe will rescue Spain's ailing banks.
The Nasdaq was up 0.7% after falling 0.2% earlier. The Dow Jones industrial average and S&P 500 were each up 0.6%, also reversing earlier losses. Volume slumped 17% on the Nasdaq and 16% on the NYSE compared with the same time Thursday.
Spain will likely ask eurozone finance ministers this weekend to help recapitalize its banks, Reuters said, citing unidentified EU and German officials. An announcement is expected Saturday, one official said.
A day earlier, ratings agency Fitch downgraded Spain's sovereign credit rating because of the banking sector's exposure to bad mortgage loans and the spillover effects from Greece's debt crisis.
Retail and tech stocks led Friday's gains.
Facebook (FB) rose more than 2%, easing from an earlier 6% gain after ComScore said Facebook ads are effective. The Internet tracking firm will offer details in a report next week.
Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) jumped more than 3% in strong trade, hitting a new high as the discount retailer heads for a fifth straight weekly gain. The stock cleared a three-month consolidation in May.
Women's clothing retailer Francesca's Holdings (FRAN) jumped 20% in huge volume. The stock blasted through its 50-day line early in the day before retreating to the key support level in the afternoon.
Also Friday, sports apparel and accessories chain Zumiez (ZUMZ) climbed more than 2% in above-average volume, finding support at its 50-day line. The stock has been working on a new base for roughly six weeks, and its Accumulation-Distribution Rating has risen to B from C+ recently, indicating growing demand by institutional investors.
The stock is up 6% this week after May sales data beat analysts' estimates.
Among IBD 50 stocks, Dollar General (DG) rose 3% in above-average trade. The discount retailer is now 3% past a 48.86 buy point from a square-box base.
On the downside, specialty contact lens designer Cooper Cos. (COO) sank 3% after it issued a weaker-than-expected earnings report. The company also cut its full-year earnings outlook. The stock sliced through its 50-day line in heavy trade June 1 and touched its 200-day line Friday before rebounding.
Of course he's going to 'say' that. The plan is to get the money, put it in another account, show possible investors that there is a few bob in the kitty in an attempt to have them put in money he can actually use... Its Murray all over again, borrow from Peter, to Pay Paul only this time use the fans and their cash as the bait to reel in the big fish to line his pockets.. Sniff, Sniff. Ooh er, bit fishy mate.
- Byron, Livingston, Scotland, 08/6/2012 23:03
Report abuse